About Me

Name: Jim
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

REPLY TO REP STEVE ROTHMAN'S RESPONSE

 

With all due respect to you and your office, I strongly disagree with your opinion that the average working family would earn a fair wage under this bill. First, any small business manager would tell you that labor costs are the highest cost of running a business. So if we are to expand the economy with more jobs then we must allow this manager to hire first time workers at a lower wage. While I am not talking about 2.00 dollars an hour, neither can a significant increase in the minimum wage as envisioned in this bill can be enacted. What will happen? Simple economics dictates that the higher the cost the less a buyer will buy. This means that the hiring manager will hire less at 7.00 an hour than he would at 5.00. This hurts the person you and others are trying to protect, that is the first time employee with no skills.The average American family is not hired using the minimum wage. These individuals have education and have sought after marketable skills.
   Thank you for reading

Mr. James Wolbert
53 Cedar Street
Garfield, New Jersey  07026

Dear Mr. Wolbert:

      Thank you for contacting me in opposition to raising the
minimum wage.  I appreciate hearing from you and I welcome the
opportunity to respond.

I understand your concerns about raising the federal
minimum wage.  However, I believe that the U.S. government has
a responsibility to ensure that every working American earns a fair
and livable wage.  As you may know, H.R. 2, the Fair Minimum
Wage Act of 2007, was introduced in the House of Representatives
by Congressman George Miller (D-CA) on January 5, 2007.  If
enacted, this legislation would raise the federal minimum wage
from $5.15 to $7.25 per hour.  H.R. 2 passed the House by a vote
of 315-116 on January 10, 2007 and passed the U.S. Senate by a
vote of 94-3 on February 1, 2007.  Please be assured that I will
keep your opposition to raising the minimum wage very much in
mind as Congress considers labor issues.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

REP STEVE ROTHMAN'S REPLY

 February 16, 2007


Mr. James Wolbert
53 Cedar Street
Garfield, New Jersey  07026

Dear Mr. Wolbert:

      Thank you for contacting me in opposition to raising the
minimum wage.  I appreciate hearing from you and I welcome the
opportunity to respond.

I understand your concerns about raising the federal
minimum wage.  However, I believe that the U.S. government has
a responsibility to ensure that every working American earns a fair
and livable wage.  As you may know, H.R. 2, the Fair Minimum
Wage Act of 2007, was introduced in the House of Representatives
by Congressman George Miller (D-CA) on January 5, 2007.  If
enacted, this legislation would raise the federal minimum wage
from $5.15 to $7.25 per hour.  H.R. 2 passed the House by a vote
of 315-116 on January 10, 2007 and passed the U.S. Senate by a
vote of 94-3 on February 1, 2007.  Please be assured that I will
keep your opposition to raising the minimum wage very much in
mind as Congress considers labor issues.

Thank you again for contacting me.  As your
Representative in the United States Congress, it is a privilege and
an honor to serve you and to act as your voice in Washington. 
Please feel free to contact me again with any other issue or matter
that concerns you.  You may also want to visit my website at
www.house.gov/rothman where you can sign up for my e-
newsletter and keep current with my latest Congressional activities
and policy statements.

Sincerely,

Steven R. Rothman
Member of Congress

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Replies sent to this email address will not
be received.  Please use either the form on my website or U.S. mail
to contact me in the future.

Website
http://rothman.house.gov

Hackensack Office
25 Main Street
Hackensack, NJ 07601

Jersey City Office
130 Central Avenue
Jersey City, NJ 07306

Washington, DC Office
2303 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NEWT GINGRICH'S COMMENTS

 
Beyond the Presidency
Renewing, Revitalizing and Relaunching Conservative America
Gingrich Communications  January 27 2007
Newt Gingrich

As we look to the way forward as conservatives, one fact is paramount:  American conservatism is about vastly more than the presidency.  The history of the modern American conservative movement was written in states and communities and in citizen activism.  Some of the highlights:

  • Howard Jarvis’s Proposition 13 anti-tax revolt in 1978 began in California but incited a nationwide revolt against big government and high taxes.
  • As a candidate for Governor in 1966 Ronald Reagan advocated welfare reform – thirty years before it passed in Washington.  For Reagan, welfare reform was part of his vision of “The Creative Society,” the premise of which was, as Reagan said at the time, was “government no longer substituting for the people, but recognizing that it cannot possibly match the great potential of the people.”
  • In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Wisconsin Governor Tommy Thompson and Polly Williams, a Democratic state representative, pioneered school choice in Milwaukee.  As governor, Thompson, along with Michigan Governor John Engler and Utah Governor Mike Leavitt, also led the movement to reform welfare – a movement that began in the states and only later forced change in Washington. 
  • As Mayor of Indianapolis in the 1990s, Steve Goldsmith opposed what he called the “bureaucratic monopoly” by pioneering the practice of having both private companies and government compete to deliver city services

The history of the conservative movement offers us a clear way forward today:  To renew, revitalize and relaunch the movement of Goldwater, Reagan and the Contract with America, we must concentrate our energies on all 511,000 elected offices in America, not just the presidency and Washington.   We need a movement far beyond Washington.  The oval office by itself is incapable of moving to a more conservative America.

What’s more, the current consultant and money dominated presidential campaign process is particularly ill-suited to moving conservatism forward.  The consultant class requirement that presidential campaigns begin two years before the voting guarantees that by the time a candidate gets into office her or she is two years out of touch with reality and the American people. Promises in February 2007 can’t accurately predict performance in February 2009. 

In addition to focusing on more than the presidency and presidential politics, four other points are critical to the future of conservatism.

First, American conservatism at its best has historically been about shaping a future based on freedom.  We should be the future oriented movement.  Our responsibility is to define a better future, and not just for some Americans but for all Americans.  We cannot ignore the moral challenge of those Americans who have been left out of the American dream.

Second, American conservatism at its best has always been focused on individuals, families and communities, not government.  Conservatives have to relearn a core principle of politics – the principle Ronald Reagan always understood – that issues must be addressed in a personal context first and only later in the historical and lastly, in the political context.  The first questions we must always ask ourselves are:  What will we do to help the American citizen?  How are our solutions relevant to your life?   This is not a formula for bigger bureaucracy. It is a formula for better policies.

Third, we are on the verge of extraordinary opportunities to dramatically improve public policies. Below are the seven principles of creating American solutions to help win the future:

  1. There will be four-to-seven times as much new scientific knowledge in the next twenty-five years as in the last twenty-five years.
  2. There is a customer market and values system which leads to dramatic change and innovation.
  3. Pragmatism changing things now, to get things done is the classic American philosophy.
  4. There are systems of productivity that are very powerful such as the Toyota production system, Six Sigma, the quality principles of Deming and Juran, the management principles of Peter Drucker, and concept of lean manufacturing.
  5. Historic American culture as exemplified by George Washington and Benjamin Franklin simply works: the work ethic, courage, individual initiative, responsibility, team work, energetic effort, saving and investing, recognizing and rewarding achievement, having high expectations.
  6. Insist that everyone be included and that a “new birth of freedom” (in Lincoln’s words) extends to every American.
  7. You have a lot to contribute to your family, your life, and your community.

Fourth, American conservatism at its best has always understood that the American people have to force change on Washington.  Washington will not change itself.  The Washington environment is pro-government, pro-liberal, and pro-elite.  The American people, on the other hand, are pro-God, pro-English, and instinctively anti-bureaucracy.

  • 91 percent of all Americans support the right to say “One nation under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance.
  •  The Rasmussen poll reported that support for English as the official language was 85%. The Zogby poll had it at 84%.
  • The American public believes that 51 percent of all federal spending is waste.  So by definition, any politician advocating a tax increase is advocating wasting more of the American peoples money.

The organization we are launching, American Solutions, is a deliberate effort to renew, revitalize and relaunch the Goldwater-Reagan-Contract with America movement by going back to its source: the citizen activist, communities and states that built the American conservative movement.

The premise of American Solutions is that politics as usual – focusing on what is wrong with the Left rather than what we can do for the country – will not bring about change.  We have to take the proven principles of conservatism – Ronald Reagan’s banner of “bold colors” – and translate them into bold solutions.  We need to build a movement  outside Washington based on these bold solutions.  Then and only then will we force conservative change on Washington. 

TheNeoconservative 1/30/2007 7:02:47 PM

The American Solutions website is www.americansolutions.com!!

swanpond 2/5/2007 5:42:50 PM
The ideas are very simple, but can really bring about change.  The notion that it would be so simple if people just try to help each other.  The light at the end of the tunnel is bright.  Why is it that your simple approach to solving the problems is such hard work?  The message seems to me to be very clear.
You could be participating in this area if you were a registered member. It's simple, fast and free.
Register now and start letting Newt know what you think!

If you are already a Newt.org member, sign-in below

User Name
Password

 

 

 

 

 

User Name Password


Search
  
home  |  blog  |  forum  |  collaborate  |  appearances  |  multimedia
legal  |  my newt  |  search  |  contact

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sen Coburn's Health Reform BILL

 
S.3488 : A bill to amend the Internal Revenue code of 1986 to expand the permissible use of health savings accounts to include health insurance payments, to increase the dollar limitation for contributions to health savings accounts, to allow the rollover of unused funds from health reimbursement arrangements to health savings accounts, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] (introduced 6/9/2006) Cosponsors (4)

Please pass this data on and urge your senators - like I have done- to pass it. Thank you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Book Review: Culture Warrior

 
I thought Mr O'Reilly setup of Culture War between the traditionalists - like myself - and the secular progressives very well. Traditionalists stand for basic fundamental principles, such as honoring your country, right and wrong, family values - marriage, keeping God in the public arena. The Secular people want to tranform the USA into a socialist utopia where profits is a dirty word and the government will take care of all of your needs from cradle to grave.
Here is a listing of the code of a Culture Warrior or Traditionalist : 1) Keep your promises, 2) Focus on other people, not yourself. 3) See the world as it is, not the way you want it to be. 4) Understand and respect Judeo-Christian philosophy. 5) Respect the nobility of the USA. 6) Allow yourself to make fact based judgments. 7) Respect and defend private property. 8) Develop mental toughness. 9) Defend the weak and vulnerable. 10) Engage the secular-progressive opposition in a straightforward and honest manner.
Very intriguing and necessary reading.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »